01.11.21

Klobuchar, Leahy, And Colleagues Demand Answers From The State Department About Move To Designate Cuba A State Sponsor Of Terrorism

. . . . Trump Administration has reversed progress made since the United States resumed diplomatic relations in Cuba in 2015

WASHINGTON – On Friday January 8, 2021, U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Jack Reed (D-RI), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), and Tina Smith (D-MN) sent a letter to Secretary of State Michael Pompeo expressing concern over reports that the Trump Administration’s would designate Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism without formal consultation and review by Congress. The Senators also asked the State Department to commit to conducting a formal review before designating any nation a state sponsor of terrorism or removing any such designation. Without consulting Congress, today the State Department announced its intent to redesignate Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism.   

“In the final days of the Administration, efforts to politicize important decisions concerning our national security are unacceptable and threaten to damage future diplomatic efforts toward Cuba and set a harmful precedent for future designations,” the Senators said in the letter.

Full text of letter HERE and below:

 

Dear Secretary Pompeo:

We write to express our deep concerns regarding reports that the Administration is considering designating Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism absent a formal review and consultation with Congress.  In the final days of the Administration, efforts to politicize important decisions concerning our national security are unacceptable and threaten to damage future diplomatic efforts toward Cuba and set a harmful precedent for future designations.

After the United States resumed diplomatic relations with Cuba in 2015, Cuban entrepreneurs flourished thanks to the influx of American visitors, and access to mobile phones and the Internet increased dramatically, providing Cubans with information from outside the island never experienced since the 1959 Revolution.  The Trump Administration has taken numerous steps to reverse that progress, and in so doing has deprived Americans of their right to travel freely, caused great harm to Cuban small businesses and American exporters, and denied Cuban-Americans the ability to provide financial support to their relatives in Cuba.

Since 2017, when the Administration resumed sanctions against Cuba, United States-Cuban cooperation on issues of mutual interest – from public health to maritime security – has ceased, the human rights situation in Cuba has gotten worse, and the Russian and Chinese presence in Cuba has increased.  By any objective standard, the Trump Administration’s policy has failed to achieve its objectives.

Concerns about Cuba’s harboring of American fugitives and members of the Colombian ELN deserve serious and sustained attention, but nothing the Trump Administration has done in the past four years has made the slightest progress in resolving those issues and a last ditch, punitive listing of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism will only make such progress more elusive.  Moreover, refusing to conduct a review to evaluate whether Cuba meets the objective criteria for designation as a state sponsor of terrorism would cheapen the significance of the designation, which triggers an immediate imposition of sanctions and currently applies to only three nations (North Korea, Iran, and Syria).

In light of the importance of this issue, we ask that you answer the following questions: 

1. Is the Department considering designating Cuba a state sponsor of terrorism?

2. If so, is the State Department’s counterterrorism bureau – which ordinarily plays a central role in designating a nation as a state sponsor of terrorism – actively involved in the designation process? If not, why not?

3. Why is the Administration considering this action now?  Are there changed circumstances that make it necessary and appropriate to consider this designation now that were not present in the past four years?

4. In order to protect the integrity of the state sponsor of terrorism designation, will you commit to conducting a formal review before designating any nation a state sponsor of terrorism or removing any such designation?

We strongly urge the Department to reject this step to politicize our national security.  Rather than repeat the failed policy of the past, it is time to let the next administration pursue a way forward in our relations with Cuba that furthers our national interests, reflects our values, and improves the lives of the citizens of both countries.

# # #