Senate Unanimously Passes
Revised OPEN Government Bill
Leahy, Cornyn, Kyl Call On
House
To Swiftly Pass FOIA Reform Legislation
WASHINGTON (Friday, Dec. 14, 2007)
– The Senate Friday unanimously passed revised legislation to
improve and strengthen the Freedom of Information Act – the law
that protects the public’s right to know what their government
is doing. The Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National
(OPEN) Government Act was reintroduced by Sens. Patrick Leahy
(D-Vt.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and passed
by the Senate.
Leahy and Cornyn originally
introduced bipartisan legislation in March to make meaningful
reforms to FOIA, and the legislation was unanimously passed by
the Senate before the congressional August recess. While the
House passed a similar measure, efforts to move the legislation
forward were stalled over concerns about “pay-go” issues. The
Leahy-Cornyn-Kyl legislation addresses the House concerns, while
preserving the key elements of the Senate-passed bill. Leahy
and Cornyn have been longtime advocates of implementing FOIA
reforms to address agency delays and litigation concerns under
the Freedom of Information Act. House Oversight and Government
Reform Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) has been leading efforts
in the House to pass FOIA reform.
“Senator Cornyn and I have worked
with our partners in the House for months in our joint efforts
to make important reforms to the Freedom of Information Act
before the end of this year,” said Leahy. “Chairman Waxman has
been an important part of these efforts, and Congress is now
poised put a final bill on the President’s desk before the
December recess. I hope the House will pass this legislation
next week.”
“It’s encouraging to see this
important effort to expand open government move another step
forward,” Cornyn said. “I’ll continue working with Chairman
Leahy and our colleagues until these reforms are enacted into
law.”
The OPEN Government Act would:
-
Restore meaningful deadlines
for agency action under FOIA;
-
Impose real consequences on
federal agencies for missing FOIA’s 20-day statutory
deadline;
-
Clarify that FOIA applies to
government records held by outside private contractors;
-
Establish a FOIA hotline
service for all federal agencies; and
-
Create a FOIA Ombudsman to
provide FOIA requestors and federal agencies with a
meaningful alternative to costly litigation.
The legislation will now be sent
to the House for consideration.
# # # # #
For Background Purposes
Openness Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act
of 2007
(“OPEN Government Act of 2007”) (Cornyn-Leahy-Kyl)
Section-by-Section Analysis
Sec. 1. Short
Title. The Open Government Act of 2007.
Sec. 2.
Findings. The findings reiterate the intent
of Congress upon enacting the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA),
5 U.S.C. 552 as amended, and restate FOIA’s presumption in favor
of disclosure.
Sec. 3.
Protection of Fee Status for News Media. This
section amends 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(ii) to make clear that
independent journalists are not barred from obtaining fee
waivers solely because they lack an institutional affiliation
with a recognized news media entity. In determining whether to
grant a fee waiver, an agency shall consider the prior
publication history of the requestor. If the requestor has no
prior publication history and no current affiliation with a news
organization, the agency shall review the requestor’s plans for
disseminating the requested material and whether those plans
include distributing the material to a reasonably broad
audience.
Sec. 4.
Recovery of Attorney Fees and Litigation Costs.
This section, the so-called
Buckhannon fix,
amends 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(E) to clarify that a complainant has
substantially prevailed in a FOIA lawsuit, and is eligible to
recover attorney fees, if the complainant has obtained relief
through a judicial or administrative order or if the pursuit of
a claim was the catalyst for the voluntary or unilateral change
in position by the opposing party. The section responds to the
Supreme Court’s ruling in
Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of
Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598 (2001),
which eliminated the “catalyst theory” of attorney fee recovery
under certain Federal civil rights laws. FOIA requestors have
raised concerns that the holding in
Buckhannon could be
extended to FOIA cases. This section preserves the “catalyst
theory” in FOIA litigation.
Adds House
pay/go language to require that any attorneys’ fees be paid from
any annually appropriated agency funds.
Sec. 5.
Disciplinary Actions for Arbitrary and Capricious Rejections of
Requests. FOIA currently requires that when a
court finds that agency personnel have acted arbitrarily or
capriciously with respect to withholding documents, the Office
of Special Counsel shall determine whether disciplinary action
against the involved personnel is warranted.
See 5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(F). This section of the bill amends FOIA to require
the Attorney General to notify the Office of Special Counsel of
any such court finding and to report the same to Congress. It
further requires the Office of Special Counsel to report
annually to Congress on any actions taken by the Special Counsel
to investigate cases of this type.
Sec. 6. Time
Limits for Agencies to Act on Requests. The
section clarifies that the 20-day time limit on responding to a
FOIA request commences on the date on which the request is first
received by the appropriate agency component.
Further, the section states
that if the agency fails to respond within the 20-day limit, the
agency may not assess the FOIA search fees, and duplication fees
in the case of non-commercial requestors, collected in
connection with that FOIA request.
Also adds duplication fees for
non-commercial requestors to the penalty for untimeliness.
Sec. 7.
Individualized Tracking Numbers for Requests and Status
Information. Requires agencies to establish
tracking systems by assigning a tracking number to each FOIA
request; notifying a requestor of the tracking number within ten
days of receiving a request; and establishing a telephone or
Internet tracking system to allow requestors to easily obtain
information on the status of their individual requests,
including an estimated date on which the agency will complete
action on the request.
Sec. 8.
Reporting Requirements. This section adds to
current reporting requirements by mandating disclosure of data
on the 10 oldest active requests pending at each agency,
including the amount of time elapsed since each request was
originally filed, and requires additional breakdowns depending
on the length of delay. This section further requires agencies
to calculate and report on the average response times and range
of response times of FOIA requests. (Current requirements
mandate reporting on the median response time.) Finally, this
section requires reports on the number of fee status requests
that are granted and denied and the average number of days for
adjudicating fee status determinations by individual agencies.
The
bill does not include the “Specific Citations in Exemptions”
provision that was set forth in Section 8 of S. 849.
Sec. 9.
Openness of Agency Records Maintained by a Private Entity.
This section clarifies that agency records
kept by private contractors licensed by the government to
undertake recordkeeping functions remain subject to FOIA just as
if those records were maintained by the relevant government
agency.
Sec. 10.
Office of Government Services. This section
establishes an Office of Government Information Services within
the National Archives and Records Administration. Within that
office will be appointed a FOIA ombudsman to review agency
policies and procedures, audit agency performance, recommend
policy changes, and mediate disputes between FOIA requestors and
agencies. The establishment of an ombudsman will not impact the
ability of requestors to litigate FOIA claims, but rather will
serve to alleviate the need for litigation whenever possible.
Sec. 11.
Report on Personnel Policies Related to FOIA.
This section requires the Office of Personnel Management to
examine how FOIA can be better implemented at the agency level,
including an assessment of whether FOIA performance should be
considered as a factor in personnel performance reviews, whether
a job classification series specific to FOIA and the Privacy Act
should be considered, and whether FOIA awareness training should
be provided to federal employees.
Sec 12.
Requirement to Describe
Exemptions Authorizing Deletions of Material Provided Under FOIA.
This
section requires that agencies describe the FOIA exemptions that
they are relying upon to redact material from information that
is provided under FOIA.
# # # # #
Statement Of Senator
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.),
Chairman, Senate Judiciary
Committee,
On Passage Of The OPEN
Government Act
And Urging Prompt
Enactment By The House Of Representatives
December 14, 2007
Mr. LEAHY: Mr. President, I am
pleased that -- once again -- the Senate has reaffirmed its
bipartisan commitment to open and transparent government by
unanimously passing the “Openness
Promotes Effectiveness in our National Government Act”
(the “OPEN Government Act”) -- the first major reform to the
Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) in
more than a decade.
I commend the bill’s chief Republican cosponsor, Senator John
Cornyn, for his commitment and dedication to passing FOIA reform
legislation this year. I am also appreciative of the efforts of
Senator Jon Kyl for cosponsoring this bill and helping us to
reach a compromise on this legislation, so that the Senate could
consider and pass meaningful FOIA reform legislation this year.
Earlier this year, the Senate
passed this historic FOIA reform legislation, S. 849, before
adjourning for the August recess. Now that the Senate has
unanimously passed a modified bill, to ensure that “pay/go” and
other concerns of the House are adequately addressed, I hope
that the House will promptly enact this bill and send it to the
President without further delay.
I have very worked hard to address
the concerns of the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, to ensure that the Congress can enact meaningful FOIA
reform legislation this year. I commend Congressman Waxman, the
distinguished Chairman of that Committee, for his commitment to
FOIA reform and I thank him and his staff for all of their hard
work on this legislation.
The bill that the Senate passed
today includes “pay/go” language that has been requested by the
House and it also eliminates a provision on citations to FOIA
exemptions in legislation that was in the previous bill. To
accommodate other concerns of the House, the bill also includes
a new provision that requires federal agencies to disclose the
FOIA exemptions that they rely upon when redacting information
from documents released under FOIA. In addition, the bill adds
FOIA duplication fees for non-commercial requestors to the fee
waiver penalty that will be imposed when an agency fails to meet
the 20-day statutory clock under FOIA. While I will continue to
work with the House and others to further strengthen this
critical open government law, I hope that the House will
promptly take up the bipartisan FOIA compromise bill that we
have been able to pass so that it may be signed into law before
the end of the year.
The First FOIA Reforms in More
Than a Decade
As the first major reform to FOIA
in more than a decade, the OPEN Government Act will help to
reverse the troubling trends of excessive delays and lax FOIA
compliance in our government and help to restore the public’s
trust in their government. This bill will also improve
transparency in the Federal Government’s FOIA process by:
-
Restoring
meaningful deadlines for agency action under FOIA;
-
Imposing
real consequences on federal agencies for missing FOIA’s
20-day statutory deadline;
-
Clarifying
that FOIA applies to government records held by outside
private contractors;
-
Establishing a FOIA hotline service for all federal
agencies; and
-
Creating a
FOIA Ombudsman to provide FOIA requestors and federal
agencies with a meaningful alternative to costly litigation.
Specifically, the OPEN Government
Act will protect the public’s right to know, by ensuring that
anyone who gathers information to inform the public, including
freelance journalists and bloggers, may seek a fee waiver when
they request information under FOIA. The bill ensures that
federal agencies will not automatically exclude Internet blogs
and other Web-based forms of media when deciding whether to
waive FOIA fees. In addition, the bill also clarifies that the
definition of news media, for purposes of FOIA fee waivers,
includes free newspapers and individuals performing a media
function who do not necessarily have a prior history of
publication.
The bill also restores meaningful deadlines for agency action,
by ensuring that the 20-day statutory clock under FOIA starts
when a request is received by the appropriate component of the
agency and requiring that agency FOIA offices get FOIA requests
to the appropriate agency component within 10 days of the
receipt of such requests. To ensure accuracy in FOIA responses,
the bill allows federal agencies to toll the 20-day clock while
they are awaiting a response to a reasonable request for
information from a FOIA requester on one occasion, or while the
agency is awaiting clarification regarding a FOIA fee
assessment. In addition, to encourage agencies to meet the
20-day time limit, the bill requires that an agency refund FOIA
search fees – and duplication fees for non-commercial requestors
-- if it fails to meet the 20-day deadline, except in the case
of exceptional circumstances as defined by the FOIA statute.
The bill also addresses a relatively
new concern that, under current law, federal agencies have an
incentive to delay compliance with FOIA requests until just
before a court decision is made that is favorable to a FOIA
requestor. The Supreme Court’s decision in
Buckhannon Board and Care Home,
Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources,
532 U.S. 598 (2001), eliminated the “catalyst theory” for
attorneys’ fees recovery under certain federal civil rights
laws. When applied to FOIA cases,
Buckhannon precludes
FOIA requesters from ever being eligible to recover attorneys
fees under circumstances where an agency provides the records
requested in the litigation just prior to a court decision that
would have been favorable to the FOIA requestor. The bill
clarifies that Buckhannon
does not apply to FOIA cases. Under the bill, a FOIA
requester can obtain attorneys’ fees when he or she files a
lawsuit to obtain records from the government and the government
releases those records before the court orders them to do so.
But, this provision would not allow the requester to recover
attorneys’ fees if the requester’s claim is wholly
insubstantial. To address House “pay/go” concerns, the bill
also requires that any attorneys’ fees assessed under this
provision be paid from any annually appropriated agency funds.
To address concerns about the growing costs of FOIA litigation,
the bill also creates
an Office of Government Information Services in the National
Archives and creates an ombudsman to mediate agency-level FOIA
disputes. In addition the bill ensures that each federal agency
will appoint a Chief FOIA Officer, who will monitor the agency’s
compliance with FOIA requests, and a FOIA Public Liaison who
will be available to resolve FOIA related disputes.
Finally, the bill does several things to enhance the agency
reporting and tracking requirements under FOIA. The bill
creates a tracking system for FOIA requests to assist members of
the public and the media. The bill also establishes a FOIA
hotline service for all federal agencies, either by telephone or
on the Internet, to enable requestors to track the status of
their FOIA requests. And, the
bill also clarifies that FOIA applies to agency records that are
held by outside private contractors, no matter where these
records are located.
OPEN Government is an American Value
The Freedom of Information Act is
an essential tool to ensure that all Americans can access
information about the workings of their government. But, after
four decades, this open government law needs to be
strengthened. I am pleased that the reforms contained in the
OPEN Government Act will ensure that FOIA is reinvigorated -- so
that it works more effectively for the American people.
Again, I commend Senators Cornyn
and Kyl and the many other cosponsors of this legislation for
their dedication to open government. But, most importantly, I
especially want to thank the many concerned citizens who,
knowing the importance of this measure to the American people’s
right to know, have demanded action on this bill. This bill is
endorsed by more than 115 business, public interest, and news
organizations from across the political and ideological
spectrum, including the American Library Association, the U.S.
Chamber of Commerce, OpenTheGovernment.org, Public Citizen, the
Republican Liberty Caucus, the Sunshine in Government Initiative
and the Vermont Press Association. The invaluable support of
these and many other organizations is what led the opponents of
this bill to come around and support this legislation.
By passing this
important FOIA reform legislation, the Senate has reaffirmed the
principle that open government is not a Democratic issue or a
Republican issue. But, rather, it is an American issue and an
American value. I strongly encourage the House of
Representatives, which overwhelmingly passed a similar measure
earlier this year, to promptly take up and enact this bill
before adjourning for the year.
I request that a
copy of my statement be printed in the Record.
# # # # #