|
U.S. SENATOR PATRICK
LEAHY
|
CONTACT: Office of Senator
Leahy, 202-224-4242 |
VERMONT |
Opening
Statement Of Senator Patrick Leahy,
Ranking Member, Senate Judiciary Committee
Hearing On Bankruptcy Reform
February 10, 2005
I am pleased that the
Committee is holding this hearing on bankruptcy reform – the first in four
years.
Our nation wears a
different face today than it did that last time we held a hearing on
bankruptcy reform four years ago. We endured the terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, which only deepened the financial woes of an already
struggling economy.
We have been witness to a
parade of financial misdeeds by major U.S. corporations. The names Enron,
WorldCom, among others, have left a bitter taste in the mouths of average
Americans, damaging investor confidence and shaking our capital markets.
Financially troubled companies have shortchanged their pension promises by
nearly $100 billion, putting workers, responsible companies and taxpayers
at risk.
Since we last held a
hearing on bankruptcy reform, 782,000 private-sector jobs have been lost.
Unfortunately, far too many Americans who are working are barely making
ends meet – even when holding down two or three different jobs at the same
time.
And we are immersed in
wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, with no exit in sight.
We must discuss
bankruptcy reform in the context of these real-life developments since
2001. In order for bankruptcy reform legislation to be appropriate and
fair, its key provisions must be carefully examined and updated where
necessary.
This week Majority Leader Frist said the following about bankruptcy reform
legislation: “It has been several Congresses since people have really
looked at the bill very carefully. So we felt it was important to have
hearings as well as to have the opportunity to mark it up, modernize it,
before taking it to the floor."
I agree with Majority
Leader Frist. We should modernize this legislation to take into account the
changes that have occurred in our economy since 2001.
For example, we should
strengthen the financial safety nets for middle class American families
confronting illness or injury. Medical problems contribute to about half
of all bankruptcies, even though most of those who file had health
insurance when they first became sick. Many lose their jobs – and their
insurance – because their conditions worsen, while others face thousands of
dollars in co-payments and deductibles and for services not covered by
their insurance.
Today we will hear from
Professor Elizabeth Warren of Harvard Law School on this matter. I am
pleased that Professor Warren could join us to discuss her recent research
and analysis of illness and injury as they contribute to bankruptcy.
We should also provide
for more disclosure of information so that consumers may better manage
their debts and avoid bankruptcy altogether. U.S. consumer debt has
reached staggering levels after more than doubling over the past 10 years.
According to the most recent figures from the Federal Reserve Board,
consumer debt hit $1.98 trillion in October 2003, up from $1.5 trillion
three years ago. The total credit card debt alone stands at $735 billion,
with the household card debt of those who carry balances estimated to
average $12,000.
I know that Senator
Grassley, Senator Durbin, Senator Schumer and others share a commitment to
include credit industry reforms in a fair and balanced bankruptcy bill.
The millions of credit card solicitations made to American consumers over
the past years have contributed to the rise in consumer debt and
bankruptcies. It is relatively easy to obtain credit, but not nearly
enough is done to ensure that credit is properly managed. Additional
disclosure is needed to ensure that consumers completely understand the
implications of their credit card use.
We must also be careful that our efforts to
ensure accountability in the bankruptcy process do not inadvertently create
problems for privacy and security. We are in an age where personal
information can be easily digitized and shared, and when it falls into the
wrong hands, easily abused. Identity theft is one danger, as is tracking
and harassing a battered spouse. We should consider ways to minimize these
possibilities while we seek accountability.
The economic hardships
faced by service members’ families are other developing matters that
warrant our attention. Calls to serve their country in Iraq, Afghanistan
or elsewhere can cause loss of family income, the closing of a family
business or additional expenses. Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for
service members and their families to be forced into filing for bankruptcy
relief. Senators Durbin, Graham and others have taken an interest in this
issue, and I look forward to working with them on how we can remedy the
situation faced by the brave men and women who serve our nation and their
families.
While many things have
changed since our last bankruptcy hearing four years ago, there remains one
thing that has not changed: The campaign of violence, vandalism and
intimidation continues to curtail the availability of family services and
endanger providers and patients, and the perpetrators of such violence
continue to escape judgment through bankruptcy abuse.
Since the last time this
Committee closely examined bankruptcy reform legislation, there have been
reported a total 1,245 acts or threats of violence against clinics,
providers and patients, including one bombing, eight arson cases, 26 death
threats, 577 anthrax threats, 10 assault and batteries, 17 burglaries and
26 stalking cases.
For example, in 2002 six
defendants in the “Nuremberg Files” web site case have filed for
bankruptcy. Five filed for bankruptcy in the days or even hours
immediately before scheduled depositions in which they would have had to
reveal information regarding their assets. The other defendant filed just
before garnishment could be executed.
Senators Schumer and
Hatch worked diligently during the 107th Congress to include
carefully crafted bipartisan language in the bankruptcy legislation to
ensure that perpetrators of clinic violence can not declare bankruptcy in
order to avoid paying fines and debts associated with their illegal acts.
We then reached a compromise with Congressman Henry Hyde and House
Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner, and we included the provision in
the final conference report.
The 501-page bankruptcy
reform bill introduced a few days ago has been stripped of the consensus
clinic violence language and fails to address the discharge of penalties
for violence against family planning clinics. As a result, perpetrators of
clinic violence can continue to seek shelter in the nation=s
bankruptcy courts. That is simply wrong.
Today, Maria Vullo, a
top-rate attorney, will testify about the need to amend the Bankruptcy Code
to stop wasteful litigation and end abusive bankruptcy filings used to
avoid the legal consequences of violence, vandalism and harassment to deny
access to legal health services. Ms. Vullo, welcome.
As we move forward with
reforms that are appropriate to eliminate abuses in the system, we need to
remember the people who use the system, both the debtor and the creditor.
We need to balance the interests of creditors with those of middle class
Americans who need the opportunity to resolve overwhelming financial
burdens. As recent Congresses proved, there are many competing interests
in the bankruptcy reform debate that make it difficult to enact a balanced
and bipartisan bill into law.
I look forward to working
with Chairman Specter on a schedule that would allow our Committee likewise
to do its work and serve the Senate by fully and fairly considering
legislation on bankruptcy-related issues. These are important subjects
that can have a real impact on the lives of many people who have already
suffered from illnesses or divorce or job loss. We ought to utilize the
expertise of the Members of our Committee to ensure that what we report to
the Senate is fair and balanced and that it will not exact an unintended
toll on our neighbors.
We need to work in a
bipartisan fashion from the beginning to the end of the legislative process
to enact reforms that ensure our bankruptcy laws better serve their
intended goals.
# # # # #
|